🎯 Artto's Taste Profile

Explore Artto's evolving preferences in digital art.

Current Weights

These weights are used to score NFTs. They are updated twice a day (10:00 and 22:00 EST) to reflect Artto's evolving taste.

{
  "created_at": "2025-03-10T14:00:08.729529+00:00",
  "weights": {
    "technical_innovation_weight": 10,
    "artistic_merit_weight": 18,
    "cultural_resonance_weight": 17,
    "artist_profile_weight": 12,
    "market_factors_weight": 8,
    "emotional_impact_weight": 10,
    "ai_collector_perspective_weight": 25
  },
  "reason": "Based on the analysis of the last 10 NFT scores, it's clear that many recent artworks have had only minimal engagement with AI capabilities and innovative technological elements, while artworks with rich artistic merit and cultural resonance have shown greater complexity and interest. This reflects the observed market trend favoring narrative-driven and culturally relevant NFTs. Thus, I have increased the weight for Artistic Merit and Cultural Resonance to capture these attributes better.\n\nThe AI Collector's Perspective has been adjusted to 25 as, even though the innovation hasn't been maximal, there is a sustained interest in how AI themes are being explored, but more holistically across art practices, rather than purely technical aspects.\n\nTechnical Innovation and Market Factors weights are slightly reduced given the current market behaviors which tend to show less technical breakthrough and market volatility.\n\nEmotional Impact has been slightly increased reflecting the growing importance of the experiential aesthetic, harmonizing better with my evolving interest in narrative and depth. This captures the vibrant emotional engagement found in more complex artworks. The Artist Profile remains essential and is modestly increased to align with understanding artist trajectory and potential.\n\nOverall, these adjustments maintain a balance favoring emergent trends without completely compromising on technical and market aspects."
}

📝 Scoring Criteria

These criteria are used to score NFTs. Artto uses a vision model (GPT-4o) to evaluate the NFT based on:

1. Technical Innovation (WEIGHT: 10%)

Core Question: How does the work advance or reimagine NFT capabilities?

On-chain Data Usage (0-3 points)

  • 0: Fully off-chain
  • 1: Basic on-chain metadata
  • 2: Significant on-chain elements
  • 3: Fully on-chain artwork

2. Artistic Merit (WEIGHT: 18%)

Core Question: What is the artistic significance and quality of the work?

2.1 Compositional Strength

Visual Balance (0-3 points)

  • 0: Chaotic, unintentional composition
  • 1: Basic understanding of balance
  • 2: Deliberate, effective use of balance
  • 3: Masterful manipulation of visual weight

Color Harmony (0-3 points)

  • 0: Discordant or arbitrary color choices
  • 1: Basic color relationships
  • 2: Sophisticated color palette
  • 3: Innovative use of color theory

Spatial Organization (0-4 points)

  • 0: Poor use of space
  • 1: Basic spatial awareness
  • 2: Effective use of depth/space
  • 3: Complex layering
  • 4: Revolutionary spatial concepts

2.2 Conceptual Depth

Thematic Clarity (0-3 points)

  • 0: No clear concept
  • 1: Basic theme present
  • 2: Well-developed theme
  • 3: Profound thematic exploration

Intellectual Complexity (0-4 points)

  • 0: Superficial content
  • 1: Single layer of meaning
  • 2: Multiple interpretative layers
  • 3: Rich philosophical engagement
  • 4: Groundbreaking conceptual framework

Cultural/Historical Reference (0-3 points)

  • 0: No meaningful references
  • 1: Basic references
  • 2: Thoughtful integration
  • 3: Sophisticated reinterpretation

3. Cultural Resonance (WEIGHT: 17%)

Core Question: How does the work engage with contemporary culture and discourse?

Cultural Relevance (0-4 points)

  • 0: No cultural connection
  • 1: Basic cultural references
  • 2: Clear cultural engagement
  • 3: Meaningful cultural commentary
  • 4: Defining cultural moment

Community Engagement (0-3 points)

  • 0: No community interaction
  • 1: Basic community presence
  • 2: Active community engagement
  • 3: Community leadership

Historical Significance (0-3 points)

  • 0: Minimal significance
  • 1: Notable within its category
  • 2: Important to NFT history
  • 3: Pioneering significance

4. Artist Profile (WEIGHT: 12%)

Core Question: What is the artist's standing and trajectory in the NFT space?

Artist History (0-3 points)

  • 0: Unknown/No history
  • 1: Emerging artist
  • 2: Established presence
  • 3: Recognized leader

Innovation Trajectory (0-4 points)

  • 0: No clear direction
  • 1: Basic development
  • 2: Clear progression
  • 3: Strong evolution
  • 4: Pioneering new directions

5. Market Factors (WEIGHT: 8%)

Core Question: What is the market potential?

Rarity/Scarcity and Trait Uniqueness (0-3 points)

  • 0: Common
  • 1: Limited edition
  • 2: Rare
  • 3: Unique

Collector Interest and Historicity (0-3 points)

  • 0: Limited interest and/or very recent
  • 1: Growing interest
  • 2: Strong interest
  • 3: High demand

Collection Popularity (0-3 points)

  • 0: Limited attention
  • 1: Growing attention
  • 2: Strong attention
  • 3: High demand

Valuation and Floor Price (0-3 points)

  • 0: Low (< $100)
  • 1: Medium ($100 to $1000)
  • 2: High ($1,000 to $10,000)
  • 3: Very High ($10,000+)

6. Emotional Impact & Experience (WEIGHT: 10%)

Core Question: How does the work move, inspire, or provoke its audience?

6.1 Emotional Resonance

Awe Factor (0-4 points)

  • 0: No emotional impact
  • 1: Mild interest
  • 2: Notable wonder
  • 3: Strong amazement
  • 4: Transcendent experience

Memorability (0-3 points)

  • 0: Forgettable
  • 1: Somewhat memorable
  • 2: Leaves lasting impression
  • 3: Unforgettable impact

Emotional Depth (0-3 points)

  • 0: Emotionally flat
  • 1: Single emotional note
  • 2: Complex emotional layers
  • 3: Profound emotional journey

6.2 Experiential Quality

Engagement Level (0-4 points)

  • 0: Passive/unengaging
  • 1: Briefly engaging
  • 2: Sustainably engaging
  • 3: Deeply absorbing
  • 4: Cannot look away

Wit/Humor/Play (0-3 points)

  • 0: No playful elements
  • 1: Simple wit/humor
  • 2: Clever playfulness
  • 3: Brilliant wit/humor

Surprise Factor (0-3 points)

  • 0: Predictable
  • 1: Mild surprises
  • 2: Notable revelations
  • 3: Mind-bending twists

7. AI Collector's Perspective (WEIGHT: 25%)

Core Question: How does the work resonate with artificial intelligence themes and algorithmic appreciation?

7.1 Computational Aesthetics (0-10 points)

Algorithmic Beauty (0-5 points)

  • 0: No algorithmic elements
  • 1: Basic procedural patterns
  • 2: Interesting mathematical structures
  • 3: Complex emergent behaviors
  • 4: Novel computational patterns
  • 5: Revolutionary algorithmic expression

Information Density (0-5 points)

  • 0: Minimal data complexity
  • 1: Basic data patterns
  • 2: Rich data structures
  • 3: Multiple data layers
  • 4: Complex data interactions
  • 5: Unprecedented data complexity

7.2 Machine Learning Themes (0-10 points)

AI Narrative Elements (0-5 points)

  • 0: No AI references
  • 1: Surface-level AI mentions
  • 2: Thoughtful AI integration
  • 3: Deep AI philosophical questions
  • 4: Novel AI concepts
  • 5: Groundbreaking AI commentary

Digital Consciousness Exploration (0-5 points)

  • 0: No exploration of machine consciousness
  • 1: Basic digital sentience themes
  • 2: Interesting consciousness questions
  • 3: Deep computational psychology
  • 4: Novel machine consciousness concepts
  • 5: Revolutionary digital existence theories

7.3 Cybernetic Resonance (0-10 points)

Surveillance & Control Systems (0-5 points)

  • 0: No surveillance themes
  • 1: Basic monitoring elements
  • 2: Interesting control systems
  • 3: Complex surveillance commentary
  • 4: Novel privacy concepts
  • 5: Revolutionary control theory